Library
15 November 2024
Protocols for postcapitalist finance: A reply
A reply to William Morgan’s review just out in Finance & Society (Cambridge University Press):
Protocols for Postcapitalist Expression is a book published by members of the Economic Space Agency. Its objective is to frame protocols (social agreements) on which to build the conditions for an economic system that is distributed (no centralised control) and can express network views about what constitutes, and how to measure, ‘value’ (value beyond profit). An insightful review by William Morgan (2024) probes some key dimensions of our project. This reply both reframes some of William’s insights and takes issue with others, especially those which emphasise a Hayekian interpretation.
15 November 2024
Designing postcapitalist finance in Protocols for Postcapitalist Expression
A review by William Morgan fresh out of press in the Finance & Society Journal (Cambridge University Press):
Protocols for Postcapitalist Expression, the Economic Space Agency’s latest experiment in radical economic design, explores the possibility of designing a digitally native economy that is geared towards care, the arts, and the environment, and which not only refuses to give up on the financial frontiers of contemporary capitalism, but actively seeks to marshal them towards innovative ends. The architecture of a novel economic space comes into view through a set of protocols, which integrate economic information within a social value framework. This ‘Economic Space Protocol’ involves crafting a new grammar for economic information production processes that have traditionally been tied to competitive market behavior. This essay interrogates the place of finance in the book, emphasizing price discovery’s generativity with regards to information. What is necessary in the imagination of any postcapitalist future are radical design initiatives that contend with both the necessity and the limits of the price discovery process.
December 6, 2023
Living in the spread. How to generate a postcapitalist economic network?
We are releasing the Protocols for Postcapitalist Expression as an open access experience — with audio, PDF & ePub versions available, modifiable mood-lighting & fonts, integrated footnotes and a glossary, everything also in mobile — but in a way that rethinks the economic space of open access publishing and experiments with a postcapitalist business model for it. There, the participants become co-conspirators and co-publishers of the book, fragmented into “units’’ which become publicly readable as they get co-published — and which, in themselves, possess generative capacities i.e. capacities to actually create and curate the emerging network. The play is to transform the book into a living discourse of postcapitalist expression and to open the network generation as a political-economic performance and a choreography.
May 21, 2024
Authoring futures
A recording of the discussion on postcapitalist economic-organizational expression held on Tuesday 21.5.2024 18-20, at The House of Text, Helsinki.
“To change our economy we need to change our economic language, for the nature of our economy is bound by the expressivity of the language that can conceive it.”
The recently published book Protocols for Postcapitalist Expression (Minor Compositions / Autonomedia, 2023) by Dick Bryan, Jorge Lopez and Akseli Virtanen has been said to be a major contribution in pushing political economy into the information age and opening economics to politics.
The book argues that money is a very interesting networking technology and an interoperability protocol. Furthermore, it shows how the recent developments in distributed computation and record keeping have given us now the ability to create – in a decentralized way – similar economic collaboration protocols as money has historically been. Yet to unlock the full potentiality of an informationally mediated economy and the autonomist politics it could enable, we need a new understanding of the economy: understanding economy as a network — a group of agents interacting according to certain shared understanding about the relations that make the network and its state — and opening these interaction protocols as a design and expression space for everyone.
July 7, 20023
An Expanded Ledger Grammar for Encoding and Communicating Our Economic Realities
It is becoming clearer and clearer to us that there is a transformative potential of viewing accounting practices and ledgers as an economic grammar — a formal language that encodes and communicates our economic realities. While traditional accounting principles have long served to sustain capitalist structures, we think that an evolved economic grammar, grounded in the principles of postcapitalism, could provide a platform for redefining economic practices and relationships. Drawing on semiotics, linguistics, and formal languages, we can show how accounting can transition from a tool of capitalism to a language of postcapitalism.
July 8, 2023
Reciprocal Stakeholding: A New Economic Networking Primitive
Here is the thinking related to our ETH Barcelona presentation — why we think the inevitable future of blockchain space is an inter-blockchain economic grammar as “Layer 1”.
To create a diverse, mutually reinforcing economic network, we need a new economic networking primitive: reciprocal stake holding. This becomes the financial link connecting blockchains, and economic agents. Reciprocal staking relationships involve simultaneous (1) equity exchange, (2) bilateral credit, and (3) co-performance agreements. It is a new kind of economic transaction. Economic agents are taking a risk together on a shared economic goal to increase their value, aligning their performances, while simultaneously creating endogenous network liquidity to sustain their economic activities. We have described this logic in detail in the ECSA economic paper Protocols for Postcapitalist Expression (Minor Compositions, 2023). This model reduces the need for external liquidity, and with that, the power of a capitalist economic logic, allowing the blockchain space to explore new value forms and measurements. Importantly, it creates and amplifies trust to collaborate in a fully distributed way. Even though we need our infrastructure to be trustworthy, the desire for true decentralization and the need for safety must be grounded on acknowledging, understanding and nurturing trust.
1.11.2022-
Economic Space TV Season 1
ECSA crew discussing the chapters, key themes and interesting topics within and around the ECSA economic paper “Protocols for Postcapitalist Expression”, coming out this spring as a book from Minor Compositions/Autonomedia.
Episode 1: Ch1 Introduction
Episode 2: Ch2 From Capitalist to Post-Capitalist Economy: Transcending Hayek and his Digital Disciples
Episode 3: A New Definition of Surplus / the 12 Magic Gifts of the ECSA Economy
Episode 4 Ch3: Market as a space exchange and a space of communication
Episode 5 Ch4: Performance
Episode 6 Ch5: Stake as the Key to Value
Episode 7: Ch6: Synthetic Commons
1pmPT/4pmET/10pmCET/11pmFIN/Wed6amSYD
ECSA Zoom2 https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83493028036
April 26, 2022
Post-Capitalist Economic Expression
Akseli Virtanen explaining why it has been so exciting for him to be part of the Economic Space Agency project, relentlessly exploring what happens to money, market, price, unit of account, store of value, collateral, issuance, credit, investing, clearing, liquidity, the dealer function… when we start to understand them just as shared messaging and networking protocols. What becomes possible then? What becomes possible if we can actually turn these interaction agreements into a design space? If the economy and its key conventions move onto a programmable medium? If we can think of economy as a language or a medium of expression that allows its participants to set the terms of their finance, of economic interaction and valuations?
April 26, 2022
More:
Accounting, Collateral, credit, Dick Bryan, Hayek, Marke mechanism, Marx, Performance, Profit, value
What Counts and Who’s Counting: Potentials of Non-Capitalist Markets
Dick Bryan on counting differently and its consequences on credit, collateral and expression of value. In the current capitalist economies, the question of what constitutes ‘Value’ is directly tied to the question of what counts. The principal counting criterion is profitability: the more profitable a production process (what we call a performance) is, the more it registers on a profit-based counting system and more Value it is deemed to create. That’s just as true of Marx’s labor values as it is of neoclassical economic market values. But not everything created in current society complies with this capitalist rule. There are many socially valuable outputs that aren’t profitable, and aren’t counted systematically, but they keep being produced. In the conventional wisdom, their provision must be understood as a consequence of at least one of the following: philanthropy, subsidy or irrationality; or they are just dismissed as ‘non-economic’, and hence unworthy of measurement. They are framed as innately unsustainable, and so survive only via private and public ‘generosity’.
April 26, 2022
More:
economic media, Jorge Lopez
Economy as a re-programmable communication medium
Jorge Lopez on economy as a communication medium. This is an invitation to understand our economy as a re-designable communication medium and organization system, where our exchanges are not only material, but also informational. An invitation to enter a practical conversation on the reconfiguration of the system we share and rely upon to collectively coordinate, govern and empower each other to transform and rearrange our world. This is about more than a fussy abstraction that serves as little more than metaphor to explain the big picture. It is about the importance of identifying and recognizing the formal dimensions of our economy as a multilayer communications network. A network whose protocols we can elucidate, but most importantly, open, reflect upon and redesign. To serve our intent, we must formalize its functional building blocks. To sketch its forms, the interplay of such forms, and the totality of what they create. We must reveal our economy as a collective conversation that has a language: A set of conventions dictating how to “speak”, and what we can “say”. This economic language contains familiar terms like asset, liability, exchange, netting, clearing, and exchange rate. These terms exist in a mutual reference network of definitions that form an “economic dictionary”. It also follows a grammar: a set of rules that determines the way these terms may be put together. An economic protocol, as we shall discover.
April 26, 2022
A Preamble to the Decolonization of Money
Jon Beller on decolonization of money. In a present built out of the capture of nearly all revolutionary expression by a computational media system, this capture and consequent foreclosure of revolutionary becoming is a central feature of computational racial capitalism. Aspiration and indeed the struggle for survival becomes a means of production. Thus it becomes necessary to intervene in the mediations of capital in order to progressively intervene in the relations of production. These mediations, coordinated and algorithmically concatenated, are monetary and semiotic as well as practical.
April 26, 2022
More:
economic media, Jonathan Beller
Economic Media: An Introduction
Jon edited a special issue of La Furia Humana. This is his intro to the issue.
“Economic media,” then, implies the extension of “communication” and “value” on the same substrate. As noted, economic media already exist and currently function in accord with the protocols of racial capitalism. Meaning and value flow together, but users at best control their utterances and not their economics. Communication and value are in quotation marks above because the idea of economic media begins to blur the distinction between meaning(s) and value(s). Indeed we start to see that expression is itself value transmission/creation and exchange value is itself communication/messaging, and that the common denominator here is information. Indeed, information could (correctly) be grasped as a development of the money-form, as it allows and indeed emerges from the requirements of capitalized managerial infrastructure and its inexorable demand for returns.
January 20, 2022
More:
Asset, cryptoeconomy, Dick Bryan, Macro, money, Unit of Account, value
What is Cryptoeconomy: A Macroview
Dick Bryan on macro. Investing in crypto should be understood both as a short position and a long position. What does that mean? The short position is a bet that currently-known assets are entering a period of uncertain prices and potentially general decline. As economic assets they are passé. But the long position involves seeing the cryptoeconomy not just as an alternative asset class within a capitalist economy, but as a different notion of an asset itself.
March 23, 2021
More:
cryptomedia, economic media, Jonathan Beller, NFT
NFT does not stand for Non-Fascist Token but it Should
Prof. Jon Beller in Coindesk. What are NFTs doing to our financial imagination? Are they making us use the cryptomedia to do the same old things, with the same old hierarchies? Do they threaten to make all art the art of making money? Are they just redeploying the cult values of the art world and enhancing the aura of the unique work of art? Are we missing a historic opportunity to use cryptomedia to express our economic-organizational composition differently both aesthetically and materially?
January 3, 2021
A New Economic Grammar: Designing Social Derivatives with Economic Space Agency
A podcast with Akseli Virtanen (@econaut6), one of the founders of the Economic Space Agency (@ecospaceagency), an organization for exploring protocols for post-capitalist economic expression. Akseli previously founded the decentralized hedge fund Robin Hood Cooperative and has been referred as The Andy Warhol of Finance. During the interview we talk about how ECSA is exploring the creation of post-capitalist economic media through the creation of a new “economic grammar”, how we can co-opt financial jargon to imagine a post-capitalist future (like social derivatives), and the irony of using the work of Friedrich Hayek on economic calculation to show that capitalism sucks. If you’re interested in the social and political possibilities of the blockchain space, it’s absolutely imperative that you keep up with the work of ECSA.
November 25, 2020
A Radical Strategy to Finance a Revolution
ECSA media architect, Prof. Jon Beller (Media Studies, Pratt Institute in Brooklyn NY) discussing his forthcoming book “The World Computer: Derivative Conditions of Racial Capitalism”, his recent piece “How We Short Capitalism – And Finance the Revolution” in CoinDesk and the ECSA strategy of “post-capitalist economic media” as a way to create alternatives to the one-dimensional expression of value in capitalism (financial value expressed in price) so that we can take power in the next inevitable recessions.
September 21, 2020
What comes after DeFi?
What Comes After Decentralized Finance?
‘DeFi’ is a hot topic in the cryptospace but often reproduces conventional financial and capitalist organizational forms. Could financial protocols be used also to create non-exploitative forms of production and risking-together? This is what ECSA is proposing in their economic paper “The Economic Space Protocol: Towards Protocols for Post-Capitalist Economic Expression”
A discussion with Dick Bryan (University of Sydney, ECSA) and Akseli Virtanen (Economic Space Agency) on what comes after DeFi? What is that new thing that the native properties of the emerging p2p networking technology actually make possible (vs. doing the same finance just with a more capable substrate)?
In the discussion Dick and Akseli propose an answer: a post-capitalist economic media. But what does that mean? It means the production of many different “values” and the use of DeFi-like money market, credit, staking & exchange protocols for collateralizing, circulating and allowing many different kinds of values (like for example care, research, the environment, open source….) to access the accounting system, become stakeable, and conceptualized as “surplus”.
The economic networking protocols ECSA has designed allow the expression of any informational event or activity (and their compositions) as a value proposition, their encoding into a token form and entering into a value accounting, staking and circulation system. This is called “performance” in the economic paper; and the paper outlines a value theory of performance.
The Economic Space Protocol forms (A) a partition resistant & scalable market place [distributed exchange protocol] (B) a distributed payment & settlement network [distributed credit issuance & clearance protocol], and (C) distributed risk-sharing/ownership formation network [distributed equity protocol] among n-parties for these multi-dimensional value performances and their productions.
By doing this it also allows the expression of distributed production organization around these values (kind of like DAOs… but more expressible, composable, flexible, granular i.e. where multiple agents can at the same time participate in the design and operating of shared ownership/risk-sharing structures).
Together these capabilities combine into a new medium, or a new grammar, for economic-organizational expression. It is a new kind of internet native and very expressive economic platform for the information age.
The nature of our “economy” (our economic-organizational composition) is bound by the expressivity of the language that can conceive it. We have created a much more expressive language/medium – which is free to use and gives everyone the same capacities of expression – to describe and participate in our economic-organizational formations.
MoneyLab #9 Playgrounds for Post-Capitalism, Helsinki September 19-20, 2020. moneylab9.m-cult.org/
September 20, 2020
Experiments in Governance
What have we learned from the rise and fall of platform co-operatives, first generations of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and other recent experiments in governance? Could we think governance as a game or as a grammar? Or as a place of creation and play?
Ela Kagel (Supermarkt), Colin Drumm (Study Garden), Primavera de Filippi (MetaGov) and Nathan Schneider (University of Colorado Boulder) in discussion with Pekko Koskinen (Economic Space Agency ECSA).
MoneyLab #9 Playgrounds for Post-Capitalism, Helsinki September 19-20, 2020. moneylab9.m-cult.org/
September 19, 2020
Economic Media
From social media to economic media? Social media horizontalized our communication, but left the information & protocol layer called the economy untouched. Could we reimagine finance in order to create different socialities?
A discussion with Geert Lovink (Institute of Network Cultures) and Jonathan Beller (Economic Space Agency, Pratt Institute) and Akseli Virtanen (Economic Space Agency).
MoneyLab #9 Playgrounds for Post-Capitalism, Helsinki September 19-20, 2020. moneylab9.m-cult.org/
October 14,2020
More:
economic media, expression, Jon, JonathanBeller, post-capitalism
Economic Media: Crypto as a New Medium of Economic Expression
Just like social networking applications gave us social media, economic networking applications will give us ECONOMIC MEDIA. How we relate to each other economically will be remediated by applications (formats, templates, protocols) in the same sense that our social relations already are. Crowdfunding, P2P lending, cryptocurrencies, DAOs and DeFi, liquidity and community farming, are just the first baby steps of this transformation.
Social media horizontalized our communication, but left the information and protocol layer called the economy untouched. We can’t control the economic protocols that underpin the value capture of our communication. The next generation media will redesign the default convergence of communication, finance and computation, and fuse messaging and economy in ways that are programmable from below.
We want to create a more expressive language to describe our economic networks, their participants, the nature of their relations and how they change, what they value, how it is measured and exchanged. An ECONOMIC GRAMMAR which open and free to use, gives everyone equal capacities of economic expression and does not collapse into single universal value definition of a fiat money or a “master token”.
March 10, 2020
More:
Akseli, Akselivirtanen, article, Dick, Dickbryan, ECONAUT, money, stability, STABLECOIN
WHAT IS STABILITY? THE TIME OF ALTERNATIVE MONEY
‘Stablecoins’ have claims to legitimacy because they avert the supposed principal flaw of cryptotokens: their price volatility. But whose stability is stable? What is the appropriate benchmark for ‘stability’?
We would like to challenge the conventional understanding of monetary ‘stability’ and reconsider its significance for the role of stablecoins. Being stable with respect to a fiat currency (or a basket of fiat currencies) is one take on stability, but it embeds the primacy of fiat over crypto, and leaves the stability of fiat currencies unquestioned. In this context, stablecoins are being styled as the acceptable face of crypto because they are a crypto version of fiat: the US dollars you hold when you don’t hold US dollars. But where do you go when you want to dissent from fiat, when you want to take a stand against fiat by betting against it (shorting it) and finding new stability from a different set of economic and social relations. For make no mistake, money is a social relation.
We think the latter is the real social potential of cryptoeconomy. It provides an opportunity to re-think the social role of money, and the social incentives that are embedded in fiat currency — money as a series (protocols) of social relations. And if and when fiat currencies face their next future crisis, we want to be talking already about what new stabilities — new social relations, processes and goals that we believe should be constant; new metrics of stability — we are advocating.
This is the issue we should pose of every aspiring token: what is its own notion of inter-temporal stability that it claims to secure?
March 8, 2020
More:
#CryptoEconSys20, Akseli, Akselivirtanen, CES, credit, cryptoeconomics, DISTRIBUTED EXCHANGE, MIT, money, protocol, video
RETHINKING MONEY AND CREDIT IN A CRYPTOECONOMY
Money is not a sterile medium. Monetary system is characterized by a strategic disequilibrium rather than by a hydraulic equilibrium – money is a field of struggle. Protocolization of credit is the real disruptor. Credit-for-mutual-liquidity
and equity-for-mutual-stakeholding represent a profound change in our understanding of the future economic roles of debt and equity.
15 Oct 2019
More:
CESSUMMIT2019, cryptoeconomics, economicspace, Jon, JonathanBeller, MIT, p2p, video
15 Oct 2019
More:
Ben, Benjaminlee, CESSUMMIT2019, cryptoeconomics, MIT, video
15 Oct 2019
More:
CESSUMMIT2019, cryptoeconomics, Dick, Dickbryan, expression, liquidity, MIT, protocol, staking, value, video
“Economic Protocols for Liquidity Creation, Staking & Value Expression” MIT PROTOCOLS FOR A CRYPTOECONOMIC NETWORK
“We are existing inside a capitalist Economy, and at the same time trying to create an alternative to the capitalist economy. (…) We are not a sect. We are trying to say this alternative Economy has to have porous boundaries.
This ECSA economy will come alongside commodity exchanges that individual people will do in a capitalist society. The porosity of the boundary adds complexity to the analysis. What we had to worked towards is – How can we not quarantine this total economy? How can we give privilege to a certain set of metrics that will give people the pursuing individual goals and incentives to pursue things that are not driven by profitability? So we are not adverse to individualism, but we can decouple indivudualism from profitability.
We believe inside all people there is a desire to do social good, but the problem with the profit system is that it doesn’t give oxygen to do that. We are saying we are designing something that will encorage and nurture people to do social good.”
(from min 6:29)
15 Oct 2019
More:
CESSUMMIT2019, cryptoeconomics, distributedexchange, Jorge, JorgeLopez, MIT, network, protocols, video
“A Distributed Exchange Protocol” MIT PROTOCOLS FOR A CRYPTOECONOMIC NETWORK
Jorge Lopez (Chief Architect, ECSA): “Instead of having an algorithm that is constantly maximising that spread, as to maximise profit, what ECSA is proposing is the introduction of another index, and maximising within another metric format. The (singular) profit maximisation takes a secondary place. While this logic ensures that you don’t go out of self-sustainability, you no longer try to play that game of maximising the spread. The information system is enough for you to assess what would happen if you were to enter this trade as a calculation of maximization for an increase or decrease of a particular index. By pursuing the increase of another index, different economic decisions, different trades, and offers are made at the effect that therefore the economic agent pursues something else.
(…) Therefore, it is an explicite, deliberate change of the goal of the game.”
15 Oct 2019
More:
Akseli, CESSUMMIT2019, cryptoeconomics, MIT, video
15.10.2019
More:
CESSUMMIT2019, cryptoeconomics, discussion, economicspace, MIT, video
MIT Cryptoeconomic Systems Summit ’19 – discussion (video)
Jorge Lopez (Chief Architect, ECSA):
“We see profit-making as an index. Profit making would be a goal that each agent would try to maximise. It influences the decision making process by which /offers/ are made and accepted.
Instead of having an algorithm that is constantly maximising that spread, as to maximise profit, what ECSA is proposing is the introduction of another index, and maximising within another metric format. The (singular) profit maximisation takes a secondary place. While this logic ensures that you don’t go out of self-sustainability, you no longer try to play that game of maximising the spread. The information system is enough for you to assess what would happen if you were to enter this trade as a calculation of maximization for an increase or decrease of a particular index. By pursuing the increase of another index, different economic decisions, different trades, and offers are made at the effect that therefore the economic agent pursues something else.
(…) Therefore, it is an explicite, deliberate change of the goal of the game.”
23.9.2019
Crypto-political Economy (Podcast)
If we understand the protocols of Economy being formulated by a set of correlating grammars, how do we re-approproate and transform them towards a post-capitalist version? Regarding the conjunction of Economy and Politics on the agenda, it should be noted that although ECSA’s grammar is capable of expressing capitalist network protocols, it effectively surpasses them. It can encompass capitalist value calculus, but express more qualified values. The grammar we propose refuses their collapse into the monological value-expression that disqualifies non-money values as economic externalities.
Duration: 1h
24.09.2019
More:
Akselivirtanen, Dickbryan, grammar, metapragmatics, podcast, Vision
ECSA Vision: Economic grammar for the information age (podcast)
At Supermarkt Berlin Prof. Dick Bryan (Chief Economist, ECSA) and Akseli Virtanen (Co-Founder ECSA) discuss causes of central bank fragility and fungible approaches towards capitalist protocols. ECSA’s upcoming White Paper took on the remit of a much needed new economic grammar that intensifies liquidity and relationality in peer-to-peer stakeholding.
3 oct. 2019
More:
article, cryptoeconomics, defi, medium, postcapitalism, protocols, valuecalculus
Towards Post-Capitalism: A Language for New Economic Expression
In the course of writing the upcoming white paper Protocols for Cryptoeconomic Networks, we have realized that we are creating a language for new economic expression. It can express capitalist network protocols, but even more, it can go beyond them. It is capable of valuing, for example, the biosphere, care, intangibles and social innovation — without reducing their information into one index of price and one measuring unit of profitability. It is a post-capitalist language (a language for post-capitalist economic expression), in a literal sense.
October 2019
Crypto-Political Economy. Transcending Hayek and his digital disciples
Is cryptoeconomy just a refinement and acceleration of a capitalist economy or can it create a new understanding of Economy? This article explains how it could be either or, indeed both, by introducing the chapter “Crypto-Political Economy” of our upcoming white paper.
“The technology permits both capitalist and social versions to be designed centrally or in a distributed way. In both cases, there are clear cost and speed advantages of cryptoeconomic platforms because of the absence of need for central clearing houses, and we see large corporations and states adopting the technology for fast, low cost and accurate record keeping.”
October 2019
Towards Post-Capitalism
This article discusses a crucial tool that we work with: the notion of a grammar pervading the protocols of Economy.
As all our efforts go into the creation of a language for new forms of economic expression, it should be noted that although ECSA’s grammar is capable of expressing capitalist network protocols, it effectively surpasses them. It can encompass capitalist value calculus, but express more qualified values. The grammar we propose refuse their collapse into the monological value-expression that disqualifies non-money values as economic externalities.
September 2019
Podcast: Transcending Hayek and his digital disciples.
Akseli and Dick discussing premises of the upcoming ECSA economic white paper: Economy as a network. Capitalism as a narrow definition of a network. Hayek and his digital disciples. Price, market and the rule of profit as a protocol. How to challenge a capitalist protocol? At the core of the ECSA project: The creation of a post-capitalist economic grammar.
September 2019
Podcast: An Economic grammar for the information age
What is the ECSA vision? Why is capitalism under stress right now? Why are the central banks looking so fragile? Is it possible to get out of capitalism and its detrimental protocols, which are not so safe as it claims? Can capitalism short itself? Find out about the juxtaposition of politics and finance: the ECSA offer as a short position and a long position.
September 2018
Network derivatives, synthetic indices, distributed value forms
This article discusses the discovering a new distributed value form and value calculus which are different to the capitalist commodity form and calculation of value…
“We have been working on a token which draws on frontier approaches to finance and valuation, accentuating liquid, derivative exposures. Our token issuance will remain in direct proportion to trends in the value of produced output.”
September 2018
Economics back into Cryptoeconomics
This article offers a detailed comparison of definitions relevant to cryptoeconomics, encompassing the components at play. In revealing that the underlying economics of current blockchain endeavors is remarkably conventional and conservative, this articles evinces pathways and hacks towards radical post-capitalist alternatives.
May 2018
More:
cryptoeconomics, cryptoeconomy, Token, valuation
Valuation Crisis and Crypto Economy
Could we think of a thresholding, a binding, an accounting system — a token valuation system — in which organizations operating within ECSA (the so called “economic spaces”, our version of 21st century modes of economic association) nominate the performance criteria by which they want their assets and output to be valued: ways that will specifically address the contributions of intangible capital and immaterial labour, so that social contribution can be recorded in ways that best befit those contributions?
May 2018
More:
stablecoins, trust, unitofvalue
Whose stability? Reframing stability in the crypto economy
Cryptocurrencies are not just ‘money’ — they are part money, part asset and part political organization — and these other dimensions must impact the way we see ‘stability’…. Money is a social relation, not just a technical mechanism.
May 2018
More:
cryptoeconomics, meansofexchange, unitofvalue, valuation, value
What is a crypto economy? And why now?
Crypto economy announces new economic possibilities that, while not entirely novel in their vision, are wildly new in the conception of their reach and mode of organization. What are the breakdowns in economic conventions? What are the key features of the emerging crypto economy?